Skip to main content

Trials for genetically modified rice in Hubei

An article in Zhejiang Online discusses the controversial introduction of genetically modified rice and corn varieties.

The article says, "According to a February 25 Youth Times (Qingnian Shibao) report, genetically modified rice and corn varieties quietly passed national safety certification at the end of 2009, meaning that these products will soon end up on our citizens’ tables." The article says the public's attention was grabbed by the government's prominent support voiced in its "No. 1 Document" released this month which said, "Advance the industrialization of new genetically modified varieties using scientific assessment, on the basis of management according to law."

The new varieties are resistant to rice borers. They were created by inserting into the rice plant a toxic protein which kills the insects when they eat it.

Tu Yumin, now a professor at Zhejiang University's crop science research institute, spent over a decade developing the rice varieties--"Hua Hui No. 1" and hybrid "Bt Shan You 63"--which passed safety certification by the Ministry of Agriculture’s Genetically Modified Organization Safety Management Office last November.

Prof. Tu explains that the protein is toxic only to insects because it is not absorbed by receptors in the acidic stomachs of humans and animals.

The genetically modified rice will be sold in the market on a pilot basis in Hubei Province. Prof. Tu did most of the work developing it at Central China Agricultural University in Hubei.

A Zhejiang Province agricultural official says his province has no timetable for allowing genetically modified products in Zhejiang. He warns that the effects on the environment and human health are still vigorously debated by scholars. Even developed countries with longer experience with GM crops are hesitant to allow them into their markets. [Let those poor folks in Hubei be the first to eat genetically modified rice.]

The article describes some of the concerns about "breaking boundaries between species," effects on human health, upset of ecological balance, and the potential for big multinational companies to get monopolies through patents.

The advantages of genetically modified rice are listed. "Solving the grain shortage issue," increasing production efficiency, reducing pesticide use and pollution. Production and research costs are relatively lower than other breeding technologies. Genetic modification technology can increase food nutrition and raise value-added, and offering more types of food raises the quality of food.

The article says everyone agrees that consumers should have freedom of choice. All information about such technologies should be made public and products should be clearly labeled.

The article lists the steps for genetically modified varieties to reach the market:
1. Laboratory research. All research results are kept within the laboratory.
2. Intermediate experimental stage (2 years). Product is raised in small plots on research farms; it cannot contaminate species outside the farm.
3. Environmental release stage (3-3.5 years). Seed is planted in a large field outside the research station to produce a set quantity of product. This product is evaluated by feeding to lab rats and the reactions are observed. First they look for acute toxicity reaction; if a reaction is immediately observed, the experiment is discontinued. Then look at genetic toxicity, that is multigenerational verification. Ensure that long-term eating of rice doesn’t cause cancer, effects on organs, body.
4. Production testing stage (2 years). After planting, ensure that yields are high and stable, and it is actually pest-resistant.
5. Award of national safety certificate. After validation it can enter commercialization and use.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

China's 2024 Ag Imports Shrank in Value

China's agricultural imports declined 7.9 percent during 2024 to reach $215 billion, according to data posted on the customs administration website. The 2024 value was lower than each of the 3 preceding years. Agricultural exports were up 4.1 percent to reach $103 billion. Source: Data from China Customs Administration December reports. The top two agricultural import categories by value both declined. Soybeans ($52.75 billion in 2024) fell 10.9 percent, and meat ($23.38 billion) fell 15.1 percent. Cereal grain imports ($15 billion) were down 28 percent and fish & shellfish imports ($18.5 billion) were down 6.2 percent. Edible oils imports ($10.6 billion) were down 17.8 percent. Fruit, rubber, cotton and wool and beverage imports were up for the year. The decline in value of imports partly reflected a decline in prices. Customs reported that the volume of soybean imports for calendar year 2024 reached a record 105 million metric tons, up 5.6 million metric tons from the previou...

Feed Boom & Cratering Grain Imports; China Leaves Us Guessing

In the first half of 2025 China increased its meat and egg production by a combined 1.58 million metric tons (mmt) from a year earlier, a moderate increase of 2.5%. Meanwhile, animal feed output during H1 2025 compiled from feed industry association reports increased by 14.5 mmt (+10 percent) from a year ago. China's 14.5-mmt increase feed output growth outpaced the 1.58-mmt growth in meat production by a ratio of 9:1. It's hard to make sense of these inconsistent figures.  [note: The June 2025 feed industry association report has a 7.7% yoy growth rate for feed output which is inconsistent with the 10.1% growth shown here calculated by comparing data from monthly reports issued last year. Growth rates for complete feed were 8.1%, concentrates -1.5%; additives 6.9%. These inconsistencies are common in the feed industry association reports, a reason for doubting the accuracy of this data.] There is no boom in demand for feed ingredients to fuel a huge increase in feed production...