Skip to main content

Do Middlemen Produce Any Value?

The Ministry of Commerce announced that its "Farmer-Supermarket Linkage" pilot program will be expanded this year. This innovative program, begun last year by the Commerce, Finance, and Agriculture Ministries, arranges for supermarket chains and other agricultural companies to purchase farm produce directly from producers.

The idea is to reduce marketing costs by cutting wholesalers and traders out of the supply chain. The cost savings are distributed to farmers, consumers, and retailers. Farmers get a higher sale price, supermarkets purchase at a lower price and they pass on savings to consumers through a lower retail price. The Commerce Ministry says it supported 205 projects last year, which on average raised farm prices 15% and cut retail prices 15%, bringing benefits to all three parties: farmers, consumers, and enterprises.

The losses sustained by traders and wholesalers--most of whom were probably poor farmers a few years ago--apparently don't matter. The program reflects the Communist Party's dim view of middlemen--they can be cut out of supply chains with no loss to society.

A local Beijing newspaper reports an example. At a Wu-Mart hypermarket outlet in Beijing, consumers are lining up early in the morning to buy sweet red strawberries that had been growing in greenhouses in Changping County just a few hours earlier.

The report says that the traditional supply chain is for farmers' strawberries to be sold to traders at local wholesale markets, then resold to wholesalers at larger markets before entering the supermarket. A 10% mark-up is added at each stage. The direct purchase program reportedly allows farmers to get their harvest to the retailer faster with less waste, while the strawberries are fresher and more flavorful. A farmer told the reporter that they have been selling over 100 kg. of strawberries daily, valued at 4000 yuan, since the direct sales to Wu-Mart began March 1.

At first glance, the linkage program makes a lot of sense. There is a lot of waste in food marketing. Farmers often have a big harvest that goes to waste because there is no purchaser.

However, the unspoken premise of the program is that the middlemen do not perform a valuable function (and therefore do not deserve to be compensated). This fits in with Marxist ideology where value is derived only by creating material objects. In fact, traders and wholesalers do perform a function by tracking down berries in far-flung corners of rural China and getting them to the markets where they are demanded. If you cut them out of the supply chain, someone has to perform this function--who does it?

In the direct linkage program, the matching of suppliers and retailers is subsidized by local officials who organize meetings to do this. In Beijing, the local agricultural and commerce commissions organized a strawberry season launching meeting in January where Wu-Mart signed agreements to purchase directly from two villages in Changping and a grower in Xiaotangshan (probably associated with the extension station there). Interestingly, the Beijing wholesale market management commission was part of the meeting where arrangements were negotiated to cut wholesale markets out of the supply chain.

In ideal circumstances, the program looks good, but central planning looked good when it was on the drawing board in the first half of the 20th century. Small scale traders are "chaotic" and hard to control, but they also provide flexibility needed in a dynamic and unpredictable market. What happens if the growers have more product than the contracted supermarket can take? What if there is a drought or pest infestation in the designated supply region--where will the supermarket get strawberries then? In both cases, the "chaotic" traders and wholesalers will probably step up to balance supply and demand.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

China's 2024 Ag Imports Shrank in Value

China's agricultural imports declined 7.9 percent during 2024 to reach $215 billion, according to data posted on the customs administration website. The 2024 value was lower than each of the 3 preceding years. Agricultural exports were up 4.1 percent to reach $103 billion. Source: Data from China Customs Administration December reports. The top two agricultural import categories by value both declined. Soybeans ($52.75 billion in 2024) fell 10.9 percent, and meat ($23.38 billion) fell 15.1 percent. Cereal grain imports ($15 billion) were down 28 percent and fish & shellfish imports ($18.5 billion) were down 6.2 percent. Edible oils imports ($10.6 billion) were down 17.8 percent. Fruit, rubber, cotton and wool and beverage imports were up for the year. The decline in value of imports partly reflected a decline in prices. Customs reported that the volume of soybean imports for calendar year 2024 reached a record 105 million metric tons, up 5.6 million metric tons from the previou...

China: Record Meat & Grain Output in 2025; Declining Farm Prices and Imports

China's 2025 agricultural production data shows meat output grew 4.2%, exceeding 100 million metric tons for the first time, while grain output grew 1.2% to 714.88 mmt. Soybeans stood out with growing imports during 2025, but most of China's other agricultural imports went down. Most agricultural prices also went down, reflecting an economy that appears weaker than the 5% GDP growth reported for 2025. Meat output growth featured 4.1% growth in pork output, 6.7% growth in poultry, and 2.8% growth in beef, according to the China National Bureau of Statistics preliminary data release for 2025 . Milk production grew marginally, and production of eggs and mutton fell. This blog previously reported the Bureau's report of a record grain harvest and 7.7-percent increase in cotton output . Trade data released by the customs administration show imports of wheat, corn and cotton plummeted during calendar year 2025. Imported soybeans rose 6.5 percent last year to 111.83 mmt, compris...