Skip to main content

Shepherd Subsidies

China continues its agricultural subsidy binge by announcing a new animal-grazing subsidy program. The grassland protection compensation mechanism was announced in May and it is set to cover 1 billion mu of grassland in 8 provinces and autonomous regions and benefit 1 million members of animal-herding families. (English Peoples Daily article is here.) As usual, details of the program are sparse and vague, but the main idea is to compensate herders for reducing the number of sheep/cattle they graze so that grasslands can recover from overgrazing.

The program will herders give 6 yuan for each mu of pasture they are forbidden to graze animals on. There is a 10 yuan per mu subsidy for planting improved varieties of grass. There is also a 500 yuan payment to compensate herders for high costs of fuel and forage. There is also a subsidy for fine breeds of animals. Moreover, there will be awards to provinces that do "outstanding work" on improving pasture and raising incomes of herders. Special funds from the Ministry of Finance of 13 billion yuan per year ($2.1 billion) will be allocated for the program.

The program pays herders to reduce the number of animals they graze, moves them to new locations, and encourages grazing on enclosed pastures instead of the traditional nomadic mode.

A herder in Inner Mongolia said, “Our family of three will get 3000 yuan per person each year, a total of 9000 yuan. Although the pasture is reduced and we raise only a few sheep, our income will not be affected. After 4 or 5 years the pasture will be improved and we will have more space for development."

As usual, this subsidy program has a mash-up of objectives. China has a serious problem with degraded grasslands due to overgrazing and it makes sense to reduce the number of animals. On the other hand, it is also advertised as a program to increase income of herders, apparently spreading the grain subsidy model to a neglected population. This program has all the same elements of the grain subsidy program: a small direct payment, a quality seed/fine breed subsidy, a subsidy for input costs, and financial transfer payments to local officials. The funds are almost equal to the initial amount spent on grain subsidies--13 billion yuan per year.

The program reportedly has been in the works since last fall, and is the latest of several environmental compensation programs announced over the last few years. The timing of the announcement prompts some cynicism--it coincides with unrest in Inner Mongolia during May. An article about the program features Inner Mongolia specifically. The head of the autonomous region’s government said, "the state pays a lot of attention to Inner Mongolia’s grassland region" with funds of 4 billion yuan for Inner Mongolia.

While this program aims to restore grasslands, another program aims to expand corn production in Inner Mongolia. What sort of uncultivated land might be found in Inner Mongolia to grow more corn? Grassland, perhaps?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

China's Vanishing Soybean Self-Sufficiency Rhetoric

Chinese propagandists appear to have given up on soybean self-sufficiency now that China has gained the upper hand over the U.S. on the soybean trade war front. The barrage of Chinese articles about finding soymeal substitutes, low protein animal diets, corn-soy intercropping, etc. has quietly faded from Chinese media. China's plan to bolster soybean self-sufficiency actually failed, but Brazil's bottomless soybean supplies nevertheless enabled China to snub U.S. soybean producers during last year's trade war. Xi Jinping now is free to make offers of soybean purchases to President Trump in trade negotiations without appearing to do so from a weak position. Mission accomplished, but not in the way Chinese strategists planned. Back in 2019--at the height of the first U.S.-China trade war--China's "Number 1 Document" announced a "soybean revitalization plan" to increase self-sufficiency in soybeans. Soybeans were pronounced to have strategic significanc...

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

Divergence in U.S. & Chinese egg prices

High egg prices are a hot topic in the United States. China, in contrast, has a glut of eggs and depressed prices.  The March 14, 2025 USDA Agricultural Marketing Service weekly eggs market overview reported that U.S. egg prices continued declining during the second week of March as the supply situation improved. No significant highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks have occurred in March and U.S. egg demand is relatively light. The average U.S. wholesale price for Grade A large white eggs was $4.15 per dozen, down sharply from their February peak.  Until 2021, Chinese and U.S. wholesale egg prices had been roughly equal at about $1-to-$2 per dozen with no trend. U.S. prices fluctuated more than Chinese prices, so the U.S. price was sometimes higher, sometimes lower than the Chinese price after converting them to dollars per dozen.  Chinese prices converted using monthly exchange rate and assuming 0.6 kg per dozen. Sources: USDA and China Ministry of Agricult...