Skip to main content

Shandong's Price Control Mechanism

Shandong Province announced a new mechanism for controlling agricultural prices to start this year. The system's goals are to stabilize agricultural prices and protect the interests of both the urban poor and farmers, while "tilting" the benefits of rising prices toward farmers.

The system is referred to as "one fund, one reserve, two guarantees." The "fund" is a special fund for agricultural product subsidies. The "reserve" refers to a complete commodity reserve system that is intended to buy and sell commodities to stabilize prices. The "two guarantees" refers to income thresholds for receiving welfare payments that links subsidies for low-income people to the rise in prices. Details on the program are sparse.

The "tilting" of benefits is not explained. It is probably intended to somehow prevent speculators and traders from earning all the profit when prices are rising.

Other measures for reducing agricultural prices include reducing fees for highway tolls, rail transportation, entry fees at wholesale markets and supermarkets' slotting fees. It also calls for continued price controls for fuel and gas for fertilizer factories to maintain the supply of fertilizer.

A Peoples Daily article earlier in 2010 calls for a better mechanism for controlling agricultural prices. The article calls for more commodity reserves. Apparently, bureaucrats will know exactly the right time to buy and sell reserves to even out market prices. The article hails the sale of sugar, frozen pork, and even live sheep reserves into the market this year.

The article also praises seven provinces' subsidy mechanisms that links payments to increases in prices. In June this year, Guangzhou gave temporary commodity price subsidies of 30 to 50 yuan per month per person for 3 months. A lady named Zhou got 450 yuan and immediately bought her daughter a package of milk. Ms. Zhou said, “If there was no subsidy, we couldn’t make soup in our home.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

China's Vanishing Soybean Self-Sufficiency Rhetoric

Chinese propagandists appear to have given up on soybean self-sufficiency now that China has gained the upper hand over the U.S. on the soybean trade war front. The barrage of Chinese articles about finding soymeal substitutes, low protein animal diets, corn-soy intercropping, etc. has quietly faded from Chinese media. China's plan to bolster soybean self-sufficiency actually failed, but Brazil's bottomless soybean supplies nevertheless enabled China to snub U.S. soybean producers during last year's trade war. Xi Jinping now is free to make offers of soybean purchases to President Trump in trade negotiations without appearing to do so from a weak position. Mission accomplished, but not in the way Chinese strategists planned. Back in 2019--at the height of the first U.S.-China trade war--China's "Number 1 Document" announced a "soybean revitalization plan" to increase self-sufficiency in soybeans. Soybeans were pronounced to have strategic significanc...

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

Divergence in U.S. & Chinese egg prices

High egg prices are a hot topic in the United States. China, in contrast, has a glut of eggs and depressed prices.  The March 14, 2025 USDA Agricultural Marketing Service weekly eggs market overview reported that U.S. egg prices continued declining during the second week of March as the supply situation improved. No significant highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks have occurred in March and U.S. egg demand is relatively light. The average U.S. wholesale price for Grade A large white eggs was $4.15 per dozen, down sharply from their February peak.  Until 2021, Chinese and U.S. wholesale egg prices had been roughly equal at about $1-to-$2 per dozen with no trend. U.S. prices fluctuated more than Chinese prices, so the U.S. price was sometimes higher, sometimes lower than the Chinese price after converting them to dollars per dozen.  Chinese prices converted using monthly exchange rate and assuming 0.6 kg per dozen. Sources: USDA and China Ministry of Agricult...