Skip to main content

"Document No. 1" Worries About Supply of Farm Products

China's Central Document no. 1 proclaims the importance of doing a good job on rural affairs work in 2019 in view of the challenges of "downward pressure on the economy" and "profound changes in the external environment." Communist leaders insist that emphasis on rural affairs must be unwavering to maintain the "ballast stone" role of rural people, agriculture and the countryside to respond to various challenges and "win the initiative."

The 2019 document announces ambitions to "decisively win the fight against poverty." It includes many ambitious reforms of rural land and governance institutions, promises to construct rural infrastructure, to make the countryside more livable, and to improve rural governance that are already underway. The document emphasizes that these initiatives are especially important this year because 2019 and 2020 are key years for achieving the "all-round relatively well-off society" and preparing for the Chinese communist party's 100th anniversary.

Concerns about maintaining supply of agricultural products are reflected at several points in the document, including a paragraph about safeguarding key commodities through "top-level design," setting up a system to maintain domestic supplies of each commodity, coordinating use of domestic and international markets and resources, and scientifically determining the volume of domestic commodity supply that must be maintained. The document asserts that rice and wheat "must be protected," corn production needs to be stabilized, and production capacity for cotton, oilseeds, sugar, and natural rubber needs to be firmed up. It advocates greater production of "commodities that are in short supply."
  • A soybean revitalization plan, a call for increased soybean planting, and a Yangtze River rapeseed production initiative reflect concerns about reliance on oilseed imports made more acute by the trade war. The document advocates production of tree crop oils--an idea that has come and gone intermittently since the 1970s.
  • The document calls for construction of "dairy bases," overhaul of small and medium dairy farms, upgrade of infant formula production, and expansion of corn for silage and alfalfa as fodder crops to support cattle.
  • A Xinjiang cotton base initiative is to be re-launched
  • A "dual high" sugar base is to cover the entire production region
  • The document calls for increased effort to prevent and control African swine fever in order to protect the industry's security.
  • The document promotes a recent strategy of creating local industries centered on local specialties fruits and vegetables, medicinal crops, bamboo, tea, nursery crops, and ethnic handicrafts tied in with rural tourism.
Agricultural policy features a series of dictates to maintain minimum amounts of cultivated land (120 million ha), grain planting (110 million ha), enforce "permanent farmland" (103 million ha), strengthen a "responsibility system" to reward and chastise provincial leaders for progress in grain production, and ensure that 53 million ha of high-standard fields are constructed by 2020. It calls for completing the delineation of "functional regions" for grain production and "protection regions" for other important agricultural products.

The document calls for designing a new agricultural subsidy system that is "adapted to WTO rules," protects farmers' income, and supports agricultural development. It specifically calls for adjusting and improving "amber box" policies (those limited by WTO rules) and expanding "green box" support (not limited by WTO rules).  Other domestic policy measures advocated:
  • Improve the minimum price policy for rice and wheat, giving a greater role to the market mechanism
  • Improve subsidy payments for soybean and corn producers
  • Subsidize farmer credit guarantees and cajole banks to increase farm and rural lending and give them lower reserve requirements as a reward. The document calls for rural lending quotas that sound like the U.S. Community Reinvestment Act.
  • Increase support for agricultural insurance, move ahead on pilot programs to insure farmers against income reductions and cost increases, and move forward on "insurance + futures" subsidy pilots.
  • Set up an award system for major grain-producing counties (this appears to tweak the existing grain transfer payment to give local officials stronger incentives to use money for grain production).
The document reiterates a strategy of relying on technology to raise production and correcting environmental abuses that went unchecked in past years when officials urged farmers to expand production without regard for external costs or depletion of resources.
  • Breakthroughs in agricultural technology are featured as a key driver to be nurtured by an elaborate agricultural R&D system that integrates companies and academic institutes and setting up agricultural science parks, innovation centers, demonstration zones, and technology alliances. The document emphasizes protection of property rights, attracting talent, and giving scientists rights to profit from their innovations.
  • A "digital countryside" advocates an "internet + agriculture" strategy, big data, intelligent farming, and e-commerce.
  • Programs to correct past abuses include a program to remediate heavy metal contamination in soil; protect black soil and reverse depletion of aquifers in the northeastern region; efforts to collect and utilize manure from livestock and poultry farms; and a plan to cut back on over-fishing and aquaculture in lakes, rivers, and coastal waters.
The document includes only two sentences dealing with international trade (in contrast to initiatives by the top leadership to expand imports of food to improve the standard of living in the country). The No. 1 Document advocates:
  • "Taking the initiative" to open channels to import products in short supply. This probably means maintaining tight controls over gradual increases, rather than passively allowing imports and foreign companies to flood into the country.
  • Greater diversity of import channels
  • More support for agricultural companies "going out" to invest abroad
  • Greater international cooperation with belt and road countries
  • Nurturing a group of multinational agricultural conglomerates
  • Increasing efforts to control smuggling of agricultural products
The document is rounded out with lengthy exhortations to keep the communist party in firm control of the countryside.
  • Village communist party branches are to be "battle fortresses" that are central to constructing rural infrastructure and institutions.
  • Officials are instructed to do well in "thought work," guiding rural people to practice socialist core values and consolidating the party's ideological positions in the countryside
  • Officials and news organs should propagandize the party's policies that benefit agriculture and rural areas
  • Officials should exhort rural "mass organizations" to discourage bad social practices such as extravagant marriages and funerals, sky-high bride prices, filial piety, and skimming off funds meant for support of the elderly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

China's 2024 Ag Imports Shrank in Value

China's agricultural imports declined 7.9 percent during 2024 to reach $215 billion, according to data posted on the customs administration website. The 2024 value was lower than each of the 3 preceding years. Agricultural exports were up 4.1 percent to reach $103 billion. Source: Data from China Customs Administration December reports. The top two agricultural import categories by value both declined. Soybeans ($52.75 billion in 2024) fell 10.9 percent, and meat ($23.38 billion) fell 15.1 percent. Cereal grain imports ($15 billion) were down 28 percent and fish & shellfish imports ($18.5 billion) were down 6.2 percent. Edible oils imports ($10.6 billion) were down 17.8 percent. Fruit, rubber, cotton and wool and beverage imports were up for the year. The decline in value of imports partly reflected a decline in prices. Customs reported that the volume of soybean imports for calendar year 2024 reached a record 105 million metric tons, up 5.6 million metric tons from the previou...

Feed Boom & Cratering Grain Imports; China Leaves Us Guessing

In the first half of 2025 China increased its meat and egg production by a combined 1.58 million metric tons (mmt) from a year earlier, a moderate increase of 2.5%. Meanwhile, animal feed output during H1 2025 compiled from feed industry association reports increased by 14.5 mmt (+10 percent) from a year ago. China's 14.5-mmt increase feed output growth outpaced the 1.58-mmt growth in meat production by a ratio of 9:1. It's hard to make sense of these inconsistent figures.  [note: The June 2025 feed industry association report has a 7.7% yoy growth rate for feed output which is inconsistent with the 10.1% growth shown here calculated by comparing data from monthly reports issued last year. Growth rates for complete feed were 8.1%, concentrates -1.5%; additives 6.9%. These inconsistencies are common in the feed industry association reports, a reason for doubting the accuracy of this data.] There is no boom in demand for feed ingredients to fuel a huge increase in feed production...