Skip to main content

Dead Pigs and Hush Money?

A reporter investigates sick pigs on a farm near Guangzhou.


An October 2009 article from China’s Southern Metropolitan Daily illustrates the murky situation at the farm level with regard to services provided by veterinary officials.

A farm near Guangzhou purchased 80 pigs to raise as finishing hogs. The pigs were vaccinated against blue ear diseae (PRRS), foot and mouth disease, and classical swine fever by personnel from the township veterinary station (these vaccinations are mandatory and are to be provided free of charge).

Several months later pigs began vomiting, drooling and redness appeared on their skin, they had convulsions, and other signs of illness. The farmer asked a veterinarian to come look. He thought it was due to high fever. On October 11 the first hog died. After several days, the hogs died one after another, 40 in all. Reporters went to the farm and saw the 30 pigs left that were paralyzed and could only breathe in small gasps. Some dead pigs were among the live ones with swollen abdomens and discoloration on their skin.

The farmer again called the veterinary station but the vice-director didn’t come immediately. After another call, the vice director offered the farmer 200 yuan to bury the pigs on a hill. The farmer worried that the pigs had died from an epidemic, and urged the veterinary station to quickly send someone to look at the pigs to determine what sickness they had.

A veterinarian finally came at 6 pm. The veterinarian did not vaccinate the remaining pigs. Instead he urged the farmer to bury the dead pigs as fast as possible.

The next morning the farmer again called the veterinary station and requested that the vice director himself come. The vice director called back and said he was busy with another matter and would send two workers to help bury the pigs. The farmer argued that the pigs should be examined to determine the cause of their death before they were buried. The vice director came to the farm with some disinfectant, looked around briefly and left.

The farmer speculated that the veterinary station was worried that the farmer would demand compensation for ineffective vaccines.

The following day, an official from the township’s communist party committee came to offer the farmer 3000 yuan. There was a difference of opinion over what this 3000 yuan represented. The farmer thought it represented hush money to prevent him from publicizing the incident. The farmer’s son said that the township official’s “attitude suddenly changed”--prompting the 3000-yuan offer--when he was told a reporter was on the way to expose the incident. The township official insisted the 3000 yuan was not compensation, but was rather “sympathy money” for the farmer.

The official said the township’s emergency plan calls for burying dead pigs as fast as possible to prevent spread of the disease. He said the farmer wouldn’t let them come on the farm, so they paid him money to bury to dead pigs. When the reporter asked the official whether he had the power to offer such funds to a farmer the official did not answer.

As always, there are two sides to every story, and this one reveals that disease control in Chinese agriculture is quite complicated. Vaccines are not a guarantee that animals will be free of disease. Should dead animals be buried as soon as possible or should they be examined to determine the cause of death? Farmers face substantial losses from disease. The farmer in this story said he invested 40,000 yuan to buy the 80 pigs. The temptation to sell the dead pigs to a butcher rather than bury them is strong. Why didn’t the veterinarians come when called? Did the farmer misinterpret the veterinarians’ actions?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Xi Jinping's Doctoral Thesis

Xi Jinping is the vice president and presumed next president of China but little is known about him. In this post the dimsums blog offers its contribution to the genre of Xi Jinping-ology by conveying Xi's decade-old views on agricultural markets. Ten years ago Xi Jinping wrote a thesis, "Tentative Study of Agricultural Marketization" (中国农村市场化研究) for a Doctor of Law degree at Tsinghua University in Beijing, a top breeding-ground for Chinese officials. The dimsums blogger has spent several hours poring over the 200-plus page tome to see what it reveals about Dr. Xi. The thesis is remarkably close to what China has been doing lately in agricultural policy, suggesting that Xi (or the person who actually wrote the thesis) has a major say in policy or is at least in agreement with what's being done. There is nothing adventurous, controversial (or insightful) in the thesis. It seems to be the work of a wonkish technocrat who is not prone to talk out of turn or wander from...

China's 2024 Ag Imports Shrank in Value

China's agricultural imports declined 7.9 percent during 2024 to reach $215 billion, according to data posted on the customs administration website. The 2024 value was lower than each of the 3 preceding years. Agricultural exports were up 4.1 percent to reach $103 billion. Source: Data from China Customs Administration December reports. The top two agricultural import categories by value both declined. Soybeans ($52.75 billion in 2024) fell 10.9 percent, and meat ($23.38 billion) fell 15.1 percent. Cereal grain imports ($15 billion) were down 28 percent and fish & shellfish imports ($18.5 billion) were down 6.2 percent. Edible oils imports ($10.6 billion) were down 17.8 percent. Fruit, rubber, cotton and wool and beverage imports were up for the year. The decline in value of imports partly reflected a decline in prices. Customs reported that the volume of soybean imports for calendar year 2024 reached a record 105 million metric tons, up 5.6 million metric tons from the previou...

Feed Boom & Cratering Grain Imports; China Leaves Us Guessing

In the first half of 2025 China increased its meat and egg production by a combined 1.58 million metric tons (mmt) from a year earlier, a moderate increase of 2.5%. Meanwhile, animal feed output during H1 2025 compiled from feed industry association reports increased by 14.5 mmt (+10 percent) from a year ago. China's 14.5-mmt increase feed output growth outpaced the 1.58-mmt growth in meat production by a ratio of 9:1. It's hard to make sense of these inconsistent figures.  [note: The June 2025 feed industry association report has a 7.7% yoy growth rate for feed output which is inconsistent with the 10.1% growth shown here calculated by comparing data from monthly reports issued last year. Growth rates for complete feed were 8.1%, concentrates -1.5%; additives 6.9%. These inconsistencies are common in the feed industry association reports, a reason for doubting the accuracy of this data.] There is no boom in demand for feed ingredients to fuel a huge increase in feed production...